Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
The University of Manitoba campuses are located on original lands of Anishinaabeg, Cree, Oji-Cree, Dakota, and Dene peoples, and on the homeland of the M├ętis Nation. More

Understanding Review Types: Umbrella Reviews

This guide includes a series of blog posts written by Grace Romund (2017) for the Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library. Some slight modifications have been made to update the work and ensure link consistency.

Umbrella Reviews

An umbrella review is a review of reviews. It compiles all the evidence from existing reviews on a topic to give a high level overview.

An umbrella review is commonly conducted when there are multiple competing interventions for a condition. An overview of reviews about each of these interventions can be useful in determining how to best translate the evidence into practice.

Like many other reviews, the aim of an umbrella study is to determine what is known on a topic, what remains unknown, and recommendations are made for what requires further research.

While searching for literature to include in an umbrella review, reviews (of varying types) are identified, but no primary studies are included. The quality assessment of these studies can be in two parts:

  1. an assessment of the methodology of the review and (or)
  2. of the component primary studies methodologies that were included.

Information about included studies in an umbrella review are often displayed in a table. A narrative commentary explains the results and key points about each of the reviews and how the evidence is interpreted to guide practice.

Librarians are involved most heavily with identifying reviews for inclusion in the umbrella review, where expert search skills play a crucial role. Searching is a critical part of conducting reviews and errors made in the search process can result in biased or incomplete evidence.

Researchers seeking help with umbrella reviews can help their librarians by having a general sense of the literature in the field (see our previous post on literature reviews), including knowledge of key works and specialized terminology.

 

References

Grant, M. & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

 

Other Readings

Schultz A et al. A scoping approach to systematically review published reviews: Adaptations and recommendations. Res Syn Meth. 2018. 9:116–123.

Fusar-Poli P, Radua J. Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews. Evidence-Based Mental Health. 2018. 21:95-100.

 


This article was originally part of the HSL News series Understanding review types. For more information about this series, read the series’ introduction.

[view original post]

Literature Searches for Knowledge Synthesis - Service

Which review is right for you?

Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library (University of Manitoba) --- ph. 204-789-3342 | healthlibrary@umanitoba.ca